Thursday, November 30, 2006

Leg The Next

On to SFO


Climbing out of Honolulu

This leg is a long one: The GPS says 2018nm as I sit at the gate, so I'm going to do everything I can to conserve fuel. I'm going to cruise at FL310, 210KIAS (M 0.72). I'm also going to reduce the climb rate from 1,800 feet per minute to 1,200.

The flight's uneventful, good weather the whole way, including at SFO (!). Even fairly reasonable vectors in to 10R. Nice views of the Golden Gate and the city off to the left on approach, touched down just as the sun was going down (yeah, I adjusted the world clock a tad for effect.)



On Approach near the Golden Gate










Coming in over the hills












Lining up for final

















At the gate










Wednesday, November 29, 2006

Some Definitions for those what need 'em

Nautical Mile, or nm (not to be confused with nanometer, also abbreviated nm) is the unit of measure typically used for distance in aviation, so distances and speeds are typically given in nautical miles, or 'knots'. A nautical mile about 1.15 miles. The exact definition is one meridian arc minute at sea level. An arc minute is 1/60 of one degree, and there's 360 degrees around the planet, so the earth is 360 x 60 or 21,600 nautical miles around at sea level at the equator. Also, 1 nautical mile is equal to 1,852,000,000,000 nanometers.

Acronyms-
KIAS or IAS: Knots, Indicated Air Speed- how fast the plane is moving through the air, measured in nautical miles per hour. Actual ground speed can be quite different. As the plane flies higher, the air is thinner, and has less resistance. At FL330, while KIAS might be 275, actual ground speed might be 480kts.

IFR: Instrument flight rules- plane and pilot must be able to fly using only instruments (altimeter, radio navigation, GPS etc.)

FL: Flight Level- Altitude in hundreds of feet. i.e. FL220=22,000 ft FL330=33,000 ft

GPS: Global Positioning System- satellite navigation. Same as the Garmin you might get for your car. Or that Scott-Scott (Bob-Bob?) uh, Tom-Tom system.

The Story So Far

Since you asked...

Leg The Fourth

Cassidy International to Honolulu International

Weather still very clear...
Pushed back from the ramp at 14:52, virtual local time, got IFR clearance from Christmas Radio, switched to advisory, taxied out and took off. Instructions were to climb to 14,000, which was a bit unusual- typically, it's been to 6,000 or 7,000 over the pacific for the first altitude stop. Anyway, looking back after takeoff, I was thoroughly chagrined to discover that the other end of the runway has approach lighting- which I could have used, because winds were calm when I came in the other day. That's a minor beef I have with FS- default IFR approach seems to be east to west, no matter what the facilities are. In general, a lot of the vectors to final seem wierd, and in cases where I've actually flown into airports (as a passenger, duh) the vectors I get from FS aren't anything like the patterns that the airlines actually fly. Sometimes the instructions are just dumb. Coming in to Honolulu, for example, the vectors put my flight path coincident with a mountain. Not the best plan when you're trying to line up with the runway.

Climbing out of Cassidy
Oahu (virtual) from the cockpit (virtual)
The deal is that I got vectored in to runway 22L, but the vectors went through a mountain range. Control seemed to be unaware that there was a mountain range... Anyway, on first approach, it was obvious I wasn't going to be able to put it down without my virtual passengers virtually heaving in all their virtual barf bags, so I declared missed approach and went around. Same vectors in, but this time I knew what was coming, and managed to put it down without hitting a mountain or making a big splat. Again, no ILS on this runway.
After missed approach

Landing at Dusk
Stats: trip was about 1160nm, longer flight beause of the missed approach, flew 275KIAS at FL320 (mach .76 for those keeping score at home). Tuned to Oakland center after takeoff, passed to Honolulu center 250nm out of Honolulu, passed to Kaneohe approach during vectors, then to Honolulu Int'l tower. In flight entertainment was Boston Legal (where Lincoln Meyer, the bizarre peeping tom, in a kidnapping gone awry, takes a crossbow bolt to the chest, and quotes the Black Knight from Monty Python & The Holy Grail: "It's only a flesh wound." I swear I am not making this up - Dave Barry)
Edited to fix typos at 3:38pm

Sunday, November 26, 2006

Leg The Third

Pago Pago International in American Samoa to Cassidy International, which happens to sit on the island Kiritimati, which is one of the Line Islands, in Kiribati. According to Wiki, the airport gets one flight a week, stopping between Nadi and Honolulu. Basically the same thing I'm doing.

Great weather, visibilty 50, with just a few scattered clouds.

Takeoff from Pago
Radio went Pago Tower, handing off to Pago Departure, then to Nadi Center, then Oakland Center.

Cruised at 275kias at FL350, pushed back from the gate at 11:20am with a full tank, landed with about 45% fuel remaining, so I came in at 175kts, and misjudged the flare a little bit. Put it down right on the center line tho, which I was particularly proud of because this airport does not have an ILS. In fact, it doesn't even have an approach lighting system, so you really have to judge the line by eye. Plenty of runway to roll out & stop tho. Approach was via GPS, with the center handing off to the local advisory frequency (there's no tower, either) about 15 miles out.

Nearing Cassidy

Touching Down

Kiritimati (Christmas Island)

Thursday, November 23, 2006

Leg The Second, With Photos!

The second leg was a short hop from Nadi International to Pago Pago International in American Samoa. Just getting in position for the next leg, really. Fligh path was 720 nautical miles, but because of the silly vectoring, it worked out to about 800, cruising at 280kts at FL330. This time, I flew using jetways. The route was almost a straight shot. Pushed back from the gate at 2:20pm, was #2 for departure. Nadi has a turnaround at the other end of runway 2, so had to wait for the traffic to taxi out & take off before taxiing into position. Control tower handed off to Nadi departure, then to Nadi center, which controlled the remainder of the flight. Started descent into Pago at 100 nautical miles out, and was given a visual approach to runway 5. Vectors put me a bit to the left of the runway, and I finally put it down a bit off to the left of the stripe. Ewps. Not my best landing ever. Pulled up on the tarmac at 7:30pm- time zone change and crossed the date line, so it was 7:30 pm the previous day.

Taxiing Out at Nadi


On Approach at Pago Pago Int'l


On the tarmac


Pago Pago International

Wednesday, November 22, 2006

Leg The First

I decided to start in Wellington, New Zealand. Why New Zealand? It's the country farthest left on my wall map. Why Wellington? Well, it's the capital, and like, dude- Wellington Boots! Never mind.

So, first leg, Wellington International, to Nadi International. Nadi International is on the west side of Fiji, and the GPS says it's 1440kts from Wellington.

Weather in Wellington, partly coudy, broken at 3000, winds from the north at 5. Flight plan a couple of degrees to the right of due north, 354 magnetic (true course offset seems to be about 10 degrees at that location). 3rd in line for departure, took of at 10:34am local time. Full load of fuel. Cruised at FL320 at 280kts IAS, .76M. Handed off from tower to Wellington departure, then to New Zealand center, then Auckland center, to Nadi center, to Nadi approach. Started descent about 150kts out, descended to 7000. Usual bizarre vectors. Descended to 2500 to line up with the ILS, but there was a Cessna Skyhawk ahead, and as a result, I had a run-in with the tower controller AI. About 10 miles from the runway, I had got ahead of the Cessna, but the tower cleared the Cessna for landing first. The limited AI of the program couldn't figure out that a 737 comes in just a tad faster than a Skyhawk, I guess. So get a call from the tower, "cleared to land, follow the aircraft on final." What aircraft? The only one else up here is that Cessna I passed... so when I get to decision height, I get the call to go around. Pinheads. So I go around. Only now, there's a Piper in the pattern, so I'm thinking, "same problem." Only this time, I got cleared to land first. Which I did, with no further incident, on runway 2. At Nadi, the terminal is at the far north end of the airport, so I flared late for minimum taxi, and got out of the way of the Piper, who landed about 4 minutes later.

Wellington International



















Nadi International

A New Direction

I'm off to see the world. Virtually. I wanted to log my time in Flight Simulator, and here's as good a place as any, especially since no one reads it besides me anyway.

Here's the premise: I'm going to fly my virtual Boeing 737-400 around the world in relatively short hops. (Flight Simulator 2004, no add-ons. I haven't got FSX yet. Maybe for X-Mas.) It's gonna take a long time, and be very boring overall, but ther's going to be a couple of challenges, such as figuring out how to get over oceans. I know I can make it across the Pacific, 'cause I've done the hops, just not in sequence. In FS2004, the 737 has a max range of about 2200 nautical miles, if you don't get much headwind. 2200 kts is way out on the edge tho, and you might not make it if you have to go around.

More rules- I'm using the autopilot a lot, so I can wash the dishes or tidy up while the plane flies itself. All legs are IFR flight plans, and I'm going to follow controller's instructions even when they're absurd (if anyone's done vectors to final on an ILS in FS2004, you know what I'm talking about- the wierd tendancy to vector way off course, only to get vectored back to almost right where you were...) I will occasionally use a GPS or ILS via transition approach, but generally only where I'm familiar with the airport. FLight plans are going to by direct GPS, unless I feel like following the airways. No cheating on fuel. If I can't use real world weather, I'm considering the airport closed, and waiting until the internet works again.

Well. Off to it then.

Friday, October 06, 2006

Delightfully Loopy

Lou Dobbs was on the Today Show today with Matt Lauer. He (Dobbs) advocated changing party affiliation to independent, because both Democrats and Republicans are not responsive to the public, but only to corporations and special interests. Which is fair enough, I suppose. Some of what he (Dobbs again) advocated makes a lot of sense: getting involved in local politics, working with the school board, and his (still Dobbs) diatribe about public education made sense (mostly). On the other hand, Lauer took the opportunity to characterize Dobbs' 'war against the middle class' as a war between the middle class and globalization. I suppose if we can have wars against nouns, we can have wars against verbs. But if what he (Lauer this time) means is that offshoring of jobs is bad for the middle class, shouldn't he (still Lauer) just say that?

Other thing- wouldn't having everyone become an independent kinda throw a monkey wrench into the primary process? I'm just sayin.

I had an idea about a monkey/typewriter remark to insert here, but it didn't work out.

Friday, September 08, 2006

Flailing About For Clarity

Hmm. I'm gonna try to hash out an idea. Careful- this won't be pretty.

Here's a sort of counterintuitive conclusion I've been thinking on:
An increase in the curve or progressive tax rates would have the effect of increasing investment, and therefore improving the economy and increasing GDP.

The reasoning's not too hard, it involves greed.

Postulate 1: There is a high correlation between rich persons and greed.
Opinions differ. But I think this is true. Common experience shows that persons with money tend to want to a) hang on to it and b) increase their holding, which leads to:

Postulate 2: Most wealthy persons are risk averse.
This kinda dovetails with item 1 above- but it also kinda hits human nature in general. Most people won't take a risk that they don't have to, which brings us to the reasoning:

If a person has sufficient personal funds to maintain their lifestyle without taking on further financial risk, they won't take on that risk. Lower progressive tax rates, extending to no tax at all on dividends makes it easier to have sufficient return with little or no risk. So, there's no incentive to invest. So, lots of money sits on the sidelines. Conversely, if the easy return gets taxed, then the individual needs to invest more and in higher risk/return investments to get the eventual return that they need or want.

That's the idea anyway. As exhibit A, look to the average Libertarian businessman.

Wednesday, August 23, 2006

There's a Long Lonesome Road in the Lifetime of a Trucker

I'm just sayin.

Skeleteens Is Back

For those who like a little heat in their beverage, try Brain Wash.

Basically a soda with hot pepper extract.

Just thought you should know.

I Am The World's Second Laziest Blogger

See The Poor Man for the First

Bonus Goofiness

(Mis-spelled fone-etically)

Onn dee doon
Ver doon gadishka doon
In dish dee voon dish dee doon
Bork! Bork! Bork!

Special Bonus Fact:
The Swedish Chef's real first language was mock Japanese.
(A fact uncovered by Jean Stapleton.)

Wednesday, July 26, 2006

You Too Can Be An Asshole

This seems to be the point of the new Hummer ads.

Especially the 'Get Your Girl On' spot. In the ad, we see a slightly mousy woman and her son get cut off at the slide. This proves to be enough of a psychic event, that she goes out and gets a Hummer, so she can be every bit the bitch on wheels that the bitch who cut her off was. Nice. "Buy a Hummer so you can be an asshole too!" Same kind of thing for the other spot- where tofu man sees he-man buying meat, so he has to get a Hummer to make up for not being a carnivore. Or something.

This is truly how pathetic advertising execs thinks the public is.

Dicks.

Wednesday, July 12, 2006

Frippin' at the Jim Jam, Frappin at the Kropfz

These 'tards over at Dodge are pissing me off.

They sent a letter saying basically, 'Happy Anniversary for Getting Your New Car' and 'by the way, here's who are new lease manager is.'

There would be the very same 'tards I have yet to get my floor mats from. Or working headphones for the DVD player. After a year. Yeah. I'll really do business with them ever again.

Oh, and it's not a lease.

'tards.

Saturday, July 08, 2006

In Honor of the World Cup

I've only got one thing to add.

That's Just Wrong

Warning: Vulcan Hobbit. You were warned. Pues.

Eau. Migh. Gaud.


There are no words...

I'm going to have to go somewhere and get some talcum powder now.

Sunday, July 02, 2006

Dirty Dancing

Before "Sprockets"...

Bitte, Baby!


For those who don't remember, "Now is the time on Sprockets when we dance..." and "Would you like to touch my monkey?" may refresh the memory.